Greg,
My experience has been that Maine is not a high priority for Navteq and
Teleatlas, and that Maine E911 and DOT are pro-active about maintenance
and enhancements to spatial accuracy.
Dan
"Davis, Greg" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: Maine GeoLibrary <[log in to unmask]>
09/17/2008 05:30 PM
Please respond to
Maine GeoLibrary <[log in to unmask]>
To
[log in to unmask]
cc
Subject
Re: Planning Project Update
Good List, however I would like to mention that from my preliminary review
of the E911 centerlines and MEDOT centerlines in comparison to centerline
of 2 most widely used sources (NAVTEQ and TELEATLAS) for street data in
comparison or overlaid to Google Earth. I have found that there is a lot
of mismatch between Google and our local (E911 & MEDOT) sources.
Has anyone else seen this? What source is considered to be correct or
mostly correct?
All your input would be appreciated as I?m under a task of developing a
new state landbase and then there is addressing, not address ranges. That
is another question that can wait, but address ranges without knowing what
that towns standard (50, 100?, or 200?) becomes very difficult to
determine. Then you have towns that have their parcel data with
addressing posted to their websites, but we don?t have access to that data
from the state website.
All input and suggests are welcome.
Thanks,
Greg Davis
Time Warner Cable
[log in to unmask]
P Go Green! Print this email only when necessary. Thank you for helping
Time Warner Cable be environmentally responsible.
From: Maine GeoLibrary [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Will Mitchell
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 5:02 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Planning Project Update
In a continuing effort to keep the Maine GeoSpatial community aware of the
actions taking place on the GeoLibrary Board's strategic planning efforts,
the Sewall Team has summarized input received from the Maine Geospatial
community, the 2002 Strategic Plan and the GeoLibrary Board and provided
the following chart entitled, "Overall Maine GeoSpatial Listing of Issues
and Action Items." The chart attempts to summarize the action items and
issues needing resolution. Each issue or action item has a "potential
solution" indicated for it, a time frame for implementation and a
priority.
We would appreciate it if you could take a look at this summary and
provide us with input on them by sending an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask] with the subject heading noted as "Maine
Stakeholder Input."
Once again, we thank you for your time and effort.
On behalf of Bill Hanson, GeoLibrary board chair?
Will Mitchell
Mitchell Geographics, Inc.
188 State Street, Suite 200
Portland, ME 04101
Office: 207.879.7769
Mobile: 207.650.2057
Fax: 207.221.5861
www.mitchellgeo.com
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner
Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential,
or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail
is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this
E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents
of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify
the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any
copy of this E-mail and any printout.
|