Tim

read the book

Rick Seddon
McIntosh,NM

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Romano" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: Pound and the Occult


> Common usage does not make them clear.
> Tim
>
> At 09:39 AM 1/31/03 -0700, ricks wrote:
> >Tim
> >
> >Both are in simple common usage.  Surette uses them as such.  May I
> >recommend "National Enquirer" or ABC News or PBS.
> >
> >Rick Seddon
> >McIntosh, NM
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Tim Romano" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:11 AM
> >Subject: Re: Pound and the Occult
> >
> >
> > > Rick,
> > > I may be a lazy couch-potato, but I do understand what "conspiracy
> > > theories" are
> > >   ;-)  I'm less clear about "sedition theories" and I found the phrase
> > > "sedition theory of history" a bit wooly.
> > > Tim
> > >
> > >
> > > >Sedition and conspiracy theories are secondary characteristics of the
> >belief
> > > >in "secret history", available only to initiates. associated with the
> > > >Occult.  In "Royalty and All That" in "Guide to Kulchur",  which I
> > > >previously recommended, see page 263;  "A conspiracy of intelligence
> > > >outlasted the hash of the political map.",  Ezra Pound.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Rick Seddon
> > > >McIntosh, NM
> > >
>