HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Derek Michael Hodgins <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sun, 30 May 1999 22:49:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (91 lines)
This is ridiculous. I'm wondering if Vicki has EVER played hockey. This
unrelenting 'spouting' of facts is getting old. Hockey players are
bigger and stronger nowadays but when you look at the game in the past
it was a hell of a lot rougher. While I'm a player now, I'll admit that
the players of years past were a tougher breed.
 
I want to hear from hockey PLAYERS on this, not an 'expert' or a
'commentator.'
 
Vicki Price wrote:
>
> [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> <The game has always been physical and to an extent violent.
>
> BUT, not near what it is today. According to Hockey News and dozens of other
> articles I've read, a lack of respect for other players and officials is
> pervasive. It's a fact that the NHL has recently cracked down on illegal play
> with stiff fines; it's a fact that Kariya can't play without a body guard;
> it's a fact that the NHL instituted a league wide concussion evaluation study
> due to the prevalence of concussions; it's a fact that scoring is down,
> partially due to illegal plays causing unnecessary penalties.
>
> According to the Montreal Gazette of March of 88, "players are bigger,
> stronger and faster." The players of yesteryear were minuscule compared to
> today. If you put that player equation in the same size playing field, your
> bound to have more injuries. Most ice surfaces are still the same dimensions.
> Not all have converted to the larger ice surface, which does change the
> dynamics of the game.
>
> You have to look at more than just facial and dental injuries when providing
> the best protection for the total head area. The more serious debilitating
> and life threatening injuries have to do with the brain and the spine.
>
> Here's a quote out of USCHO's Todd Milewski's piece called "Sudden Impact."
> "The more I talk to doctors, the more we discuss things, the actual
> concussion really has not a lot to do with the helmet the guys are wearing or
> the mouthguard or anything," he said. "It's just guys get banged hard enough,
> with the way the brain sits in the skull, if it's banged the right way, it's
> possible to get a concussion."
> One part of the debate on the emergence of head injuries is the equipment
> players wear. By NCAA rules, players must wear a helmet with a face shield
> and a mouth guard when on the ice. But, Johnson said the debate goes further.
>
> "There's a lot more to it than just those two things," he said." T.R. Moreau
> of Wisconsin had his mouthguard in, he had his helmet on, it was all in
> place, and yet he still had a significant head injury."
>
> < USA Hockey also allows legal adults (18) to sign a waiver and take off the
> mask. Overwhelmingly, players sign to wear a half or no shield. Yes, with
> some it's peer pressure, but with most it's comfort and visibility--as well
> as respect.
>
> The only thing this tells me is that USA Hockey won't sanction the half
> because of liability. Overall, that must mean insurance companies are heeding
> the medical sector, like the American Medical Association, which in part put
> pressure on the NCAA to use helmets and full face protection. I agree totally
> with you that the half affords more comfort and visibility. Coaches want the
> half so players will have better peripheral vision, thus seeing the ice
> better and the players around them. It makes sense if you could get rid of
> stick work and other upper body infractions, which can cause serious head,
> facial and spinal injuries.
>
> <Hockey is a physical, tough game. If you don't like it go watch ringette.
>
> Just because I'm against excessive violence and illegal intent to injure play
> (you can't DENY it's existence) doesn't mean I don't LOVE HOCKEY. You guys
> see everything as BLACK or WHITE. Because I'm criticizing some aspect of the
> sport you infer that means I don't like it, and I should watch ringette. No
> way. The girls are not as skilled as the guys (ON THE ICE).
>
> Vicki
>
> HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
> [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.
 
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Derek Michael Hodgins
Columbia Design, Co.
[log in to unmask]
http://www.cyberhole.com
 
Syracuse University
Student-Aerospace Engineering
SU Ice Hockey Club
[log in to unmask]
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2