Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 08:37:23 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001D_01BF8810.5C11D4F0" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The late David Ignatow wrote that T.S. Eliot was "not the kind of man to take a piss in the street". But Williams was. These men, and their works, are incomparable.
"Remember
the peon in the lost
Eisenstein film drinking
from a wine-skin with the abandon
of a horse drinking
so that it slopped down his chin?
down his neck, dribbling
over his shirt-front and down
onto his pants--laughing, toothless?
Heavenly man!"
As for Carlo's criticism "half-digested", let me direct your attention to Williams' poem "A Smiling Dane" (you'll find it in the Collected Later Poems 1950-62).
Tim Romano
Carlo Parcelli wrote:
[ ...] Paterson is highly allusive in imitation
of Pound and Eliot. It is also a poorly integrated, half-digested
collection of flotsam (literally and metaphorically) that pales by
comparison to the work of the expatriots.
|
|
|