aadolf wrote:
>
> the distinction between neo and not neo can and i think should be understood as text-nietszche and fascist-nietiszche; much like pound should i think be understood as pre-totalitarian fascist rather than totalitarian fascist.
>
> tony.
>
This doesn't cohere.

Neo-N is to the real thing (not-neo)

as

text of N is to Fascism of N

So Neo-N is the text of N (THat is N wrote is texts after he had died)

while

While The real texts of N are fascism.

I know you don't mean this. Try to be a bit clearer.

Carrol