my 0.2 cents:
 
Pound is first a Confucious, then somebody else (very bright, mentally ill,
fascist etc. ). I doubt if we can plot Pound without fully understanding his
link to Confucious. I am very curious about it, and am looking forward to
learning more from you netters.
 
Peter Bi
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Everett Lee Lady <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 1999 3:10 PM
Subject: Oops!
 
 
> I just realized that I made another error.  As stated, I recall Pound
> saying sometime, probably 1957, that he had decided on a policy of not
> accepting any new regular visitors at St. Elizabeths unless they had read
> two of the slim volumes published by the Square Dollar Press.
>
> In fact, the books in question were the one by Del Mar and Fenellosa's
> famous memoir on the Chinese written character as a medium for poetry.
> I was incorrect in saying that the second volume was the ANALECTS of
> Confucious.
> ...................