JOEBOX-L Archives

Joebox User

JOEBOX-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502d75d30399304b7734af7
Sender:
Joebox User <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Ray Soucy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:21:40 -0500
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Joebox User <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (994 bytes) , text/html (2101 bytes)
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Kyle Green <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Ray Soucy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Question:
>>
>> Is the requirement of having to install a custom root CA a show stopper?
>>  If so, for what reasons (too much work to deploy; privacy or ethical
>> concerns; etc)
>>
>
> It is for us; we simply have too many non-school-owned machines (we rely
> heavily on BYOD) on our network.
>

This seems to be the major reason that the proxy method wasn't widely
adopted.


>
>
>> If you don't think you could deploy custom root CA's in your environment,
>> would using OpenDNS instead of MECguard be an acceptable alternative?
>>
>
> As in "getting rid of MECguard completely and switching entirely to
> OpenDNS filtering at all sites?"
>
>
Yes, or using MECguard and not filtering SSL (the firewall always being an
option)

-- 
Ray Soucy

Epic Communications Specialist

Phone: +1 (207) 561-3526

Networkmaine, a Unit of the University of Maine System
http://www.networkmaine.net/


ATOM RSS1 RSS2