So we should cancel all public gatherings? What about the athletes who
could infect another team? If you cancel the audience, shouldn't you
also cancel the event?
Americans have a propensity to panic at everything. Its easy to carry
the idea of isolation to the extreme, but you really can't live like
that. The virus is out of the bag and will continue to spread with or
without gatherings of people. If you are ill, or fear you are ill, or
test positive (clearly as Dear Professor "very stable genius" Trump
anyone can have the test who wants it - he said so himself from the
CDC), then by all means self isolate. But cancelling all sporting
events is unlikely to have much impact on this virus.
I have tickets to concerts, plays, travel plans..... I am 75 and
therefore "at risk" of dying if I contract the virus, but I am not going
to dig a hole and pull the top in over me. And I doubt very many other
people would do that either. So we're back to what I suggested
earlier. Use common sense, don't expose others if you think you are
ill, but make your own decisions.
*Tom *
=====================================================
If everything seems to be going well,
you have obviously overlooked something.
Support bacteria; they're the only culture some people can cultivate.
======================================================
On 3/8/2020 8:35 PM, Mark Lewin wrote:
> In an ideal world, I’m a believer of personal freedom and
> responsibility. In such a world, I would totally support a policy of
> offering refunds to whoever wanted it and allowing fans to personally
> decide whether they want to risk attending the game. If they became
> ill or died thereafter, so be it. Their choice.
>
> However, it’s not an ideal world. People making their own personal
> choice would come to the game, “possibly” become infected and then go
> back out into the real world. Then the virus would incubate for some
> period of time, and the infected person would then become contagious
> before showing any symptoms of becoming ill. What would happen when
> those infected people show up in supermarkets, train stations,
> airports or (if they were lucky) show up for a hockey tournament the
> following weekend? Thousands of people are now facing risk of
> exposure. What about their right to choose their risk of exposure?
>
> Isn’t what what we are talking about here, the very definition of
> public health policy?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Mar 8, 2020, at 20:27, Tom Rowe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>> "When you have no idea the cause or the transmission mechanism
>> within your country of a virus,...." Which explains precisely why
>> putting an empty seat between people is not much of a solution. IMO,
>> such as it is, would be to allow the fans to make up their own minds
>> but refund tickets that they turn in if they choose not to attend.
>>
>> *Tom *
>> =====================================================
>> If everything seems to be going well,
>> you have obviously overlooked something.
>>
>> Support bacteria; they're the only culture some people can cultivate.
>> ======================================================
>> On 3/8/2020 5:51 PM, Hampton, Nathan E wrote:
>>> When you have no idea the cause or the transmission mechanism within
>>> your country of a virus, I assume over precaution is called for. But
>>> why not, with full warning to attendees, that only half of the
>>> stadium capacity will be admitted and those inside must have one
>>> chair between them and the next person - should be enough to avoid
>>> cross contamination. Individuals can make their own health decisions
>>> better than a central authority (arena owner) can. Of course, the
>>> drawback to that would be what if attendees at NCAA hockey games did
>>> get sick and die, then there would be fewer of us to champion,
>>> advocate, and lobby for hockey. As a hockey fan, I sure would not
>>> like to be treated like a rat in the Black Plague.
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List
>>> <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Carol White
>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, March 8, 2020 5:25:37 PM
>>> *To:* [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>>> *Subject:* Re: it's starting
>>> Thanks for posting this Mark. I heard this from Adam Wodon on
>>> facebook so I was warned. It seems crazy, but I will roll with what
>>> is best for our country to not let this disease spread if we can
>>> help it.
>>>
>>> Hoping it won't cancel the Frozen Four, but it *could* happen folks.
>>> The whole world has gone crazy!
>>>
>>> Carol
>>> Go Gophers!!!
>>> .
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 5:21 PM Mark Lewin <[log in to unmask]
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If you receive emails from CHN, you've probably heard that RPI
>>> has implemented a social contact protocol because of a confirmed
>>> case of COVID-19 in the capital district of NY. As a result, the
>>> ECAC quarterfinal series against Harvard will be played as
>>> scheduled this coming weekend but with no spectators allowed.
>>>
>>> I'm disappointed and am hopeful that the Institute's response
>>> is over abundance of caution. But disappointment over a
>>> sporting event is much more preferable to facilitating the
>>> spread of a virus that can lead to the death of even one individual.
>>>
>>> There are comments from season ticket holders to RPI games who
>>> are spewing venom on the RPI sports list about how stupid and
>>> irresponsible it is of RPI to restrict access to the game just
>>> because of some silly germ. Fortunately, most responses are
>>> expressing disappointment but fully support RPI's reaction.
>>>
>>> I'm putting this out on the national list since I'm thinking
>>> this is just the beginning. RPI has taken this action first but
>>> I wouldn't be surprised if this trend continues across the country
>>>
>>> <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avast.com%2Fsig-email%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dlink%26utm_campaign%3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail%26utm_term%3Dicon&data=02%7C01%7Cnehampton%40STCLOUDSTATE.EDU%7C829b4c2e387243a091cb08d7c3afd257%7C5011c7c60ab446ab9ef4fae74a921a7f%7C0%7C0%7C637193032220974528&sdata=xo9XVdw2OqWa8EvvJcZ%2FqhRl%2Fm0KiMinDQg5Y8MVhJk%3D&reserved=0>
>>> Virus-free. *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt
>>> from "nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com" claiming to be*
>>> www.avast.com
>>> <https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.avast.com%2Fsig-email%3Futm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dlink%26utm_campaign%3Dsig-email%26utm_content%3Dwebmail%26utm_term%3Dlink&data=02%7C01%7Cnehampton%40STCLOUDSTATE.EDU%7C829b4c2e387243a091cb08d7c3afd257%7C5011c7c60ab446ab9ef4fae74a921a7f%7C0%7C0%7C637193032220979496&sdata=1sORvnU0JwrgKDBrtrBqTqiS%2BZTQAEDeRVdDqKUjJdM%3D&reserved=0>
>>>
>>>
>>
|
