HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
College Hockey discussion list <HOCKEY-L@MAINE>
Date:
Wed, 16 May 90 17:47:09 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (120 lines)
    The NCAA reduced the length of overtime in regular season
    games from ten minutes to five minutes for 1989-90, and
    since I have all results for 1988-89 and 1989-90, I thought
    I'd do a quick study and see if the shorter overtime had
    any discernable effect on the number of games that ended
    up as ties.
 
    Of course, including several more years prior to 1988-89
    might give a different result, as would including more
    years with the 5-minute OT, but I don't have easy access to
    either of those sets of data.  I also do not have the times
    that the game-winning goals were scored in most of these
    games, otherwise I'd like to see just how far into OT a
    game-winner tends to come.
 
    The games under consideration were all regular season games
    played between two Division I teams in each of the two years.
    Division I teams were considered to be teams in the four
    conferences, plus the following independents: Air Force,
    Alabama-Huntsville, Alaska-Anchorage, Alaska-Fairbanks, Kent
    State, Notre Dame, and St Cloud.  Since Kent did not play in
    1988-89, there were a total of 43 teams considered to be
    Division I in 1988-89 and 44 in 1989-90.  Merrimack was listed
    with independents in 1988-89 and with Hockey East in 1989-90.
    Since the objective was to determine the overall effect of
    shortening overtime, it did not really matter what group a
    team was placed with except when looking at the league numbers.
 
    There were a few games over the two years that were actually
    decided in double or triple overtime in the regular season
    (tournament games).  I considered a game a tie if it was not
    decided until after the first five or ten minutes of overtime
    (depending on which year).  Also, a game in the 1988 Nissan/Jeep
    tourney in Alaska between Michigan Tech and Minnesota was tied
    at two after regulation, but since it was the consolation game,
    no overtime was played (this does not happen in all tourneys).
    So, I threw that game out.
 
    The following charts indicate 1) what percentage of games went
    into overtime by league each year, and 2) what percentage of
    overtime games were decided, i.e. there was a winner.  The
    abbreviations are: GP - number of games played (in a league,
    for example), #OT - number of those games that went into OT,
    %OT - percentage of those games that went into OT, #dec. -
    number of overtime games that were decided, %dec. - percentage of
    overtime games that were decided, #T - number of OT games that
    ended up tied, and %T - percentage of OT games that ended up tied.
 
    Leagues are: CCHA - Central Collegiate Hockey Association, WCHA -
    Western Collegiate Hockey Association, ECAC - Eastern Colleges
    Athletic Conference, HE - Hockey East, Indep/NL - games played
    between independents or nonleague games played by league members,
    and HE-WCHA in 1988-89 refers to the 56 (8x7) games played between
    members of those leagues as part of the interlocking scheduling
    agreement that terminated after that year.  Those games counted
    in the standings of both HE and the WCHA.
 
       1988-89
       -------
League     GP #OT %OT  #dec. %dec. #T   %T
===========================================
CCHA      144  30 20.8  13   43.3  17  56.7
WCHA      112  25 22.3  18   72.0   7  28.0
ECAC      132  15 11.4  11   73.3   4  26.7
HE         63   5  8.9   2   40.0   3  60.0
HE-WCHA    56   9 16.1   5   55.6   4  44.4
Indep/NL  161  18 11.1   9   50.0   9  50.0
          =================================
Total     668 102 15.3  58   56.9  44  43.1
 
 
       1989-90
       -------
League     GP #OT %OT  #dec. %dec. #T   %T
===========================================
CCHA      144  24 16.7  10   41.7  14  58.3
WCHA      112  14 12.5   9   64.3   5  35.7
ECAC      132  22 16.7  10   45.5  12  54.5
HE         84  13 15.5   7   53.8   6  46.2
HE-WCHA    --  -- ----  --   ----  --  ----
Indep/NL  216  24 11.1  13   54.2  11  45.8
          =================================
Total     688  97 14.1  49   50.5  47  49.5
 
    Here are the totals again so we can compare them:
 
           GP #OT %OT  #dec. %dec. #T   %T
1988-89   668 102 15.3  58   56.9  44  43.1  10-min OT
1989-90   688  97 14.1  49   50.5  47  49.5   5-min OT
 
    Just by looking at these two years, it looks like
    the shorter OT has resulted in more ties, but not
    too many more.  In fact, the overall rate of ties
    divided by games played only increased from 6.587%
    to 6.831%.
 
    Leagues also seemed to pretty much maintain their rates
    of ties and OT games.  The ECAC did have a larger rate
    of ties this year, but that was really an exception
    and there's not enough information to determine if that was
    a result of the shorter OT.
 
    So, even though I preferred the longer overtime (hey, I
    wish every game was sudden-death!), I have to conclude that
    there's no real evidence that a shorter overtime results
    in more ties.  At least, not significantly more.
 
    There you have it.  Enjoy it, show it to your friends,
    whatever.  I'll leave you with this thought:
 
    Ohio State has not lost any of their 15 regular season overtime
    games (5-0-10) in the last two seasons.  The Buckeyes are
    20-46-10 in that time.
 
 
    - mike
 
    p.s. there's no truth to the rumor that I started this study this morning
        at 2 am after watching Edmonton beat Boston in triple overtime...

ATOM RSS1 RSS2