HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Gilreath <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:28:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Hey I’m still here!   Nice to hear from people again. :-)

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 12, 2019, at 3:15 PM, White, Jeffrey <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Yes, Red Sox anxieties on hold for a bit.  A kind of pleasant time-warp feeling.  Carol White, Tony Buffa, Mike Machnik!  Hockey-L old "Heavies."  What next?!?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: - Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Carol White
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 2:08 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: UMass game penalties
> 
> Hey Tony,  
> 
> There hasn’t been this much chatter in a long time. I am loving it as I am not in Buffalo!
> 
> Carol, QoGH 
> 
> Sent from my iPod
> 
>> On Apr 12, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Anthony Buffa <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> I love the “old time” discussion, as viewed from here out on the west coast — where dinner might (it didnt) interfere with watching the games! 
>> 
>> Great to hear from Mike M again and as to Mark’s comment …. Dont call me Surely! :-) (some of you might be old enough to get the reference to “Airplane”??) ….
>> 
>> Sorry for the non-hockey content, but just watching the NCAAs with no team to root for has become, unfortunately, rather routine for us RPI folks. :-(
>> 
>> Cheers to all, enjoy the game on Saturday.
>> 
>> Tony Buffa
>> RPI ‘64
>> San Luis Obispo, CA
>> 
>>> On Apr 12, 2019, at 9:46 AM, Mark Lewin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Not sure I agree with Mike's assessment.  The only reason I could see Carle not challenging the non-call is if both he and his staff upstairs did not see the hit.
>>> 
>>> At that point in the game,  the clock is running down and DU has UMass back on their heels (do hockey skates have heels?).  A 5 minute major plus the loss of another forward would afford an enormous advantage to the surging Denver team.  Well worth the risk of losing a challenge.  Even if the referees claim they didn't see it or didn't think it was a major penalty,  forcing them to look at the video would "surely"  have changed their minds (as surely as anything is sure when dealing with referees).
>>> 
>>> I think the first year coach was overly cautious and made a bad choice.   I think he will look at the replay and regret his decision of non-challenge for many years to come
>>> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2