HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:44:55 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (131 lines)
With the conference post-season tournaments over and the NCAA tournament
almost upon us, it's time to announce the winners of the Pick the
Post-Season Tournament contests.  For Contest #2, in which all rounds are
scored the same, the overall winner is...

       Mark Lewin

whose total of 76 points was good enough to beat runner-up Charlie Shub
by two.  Congratulations, Mark!

As for the individual conference winners...

William Sangrey won the ECAC race with 22 points.

Charlie Shub's 22 points were good for the top spot in Hockey East.

The WCHA went to Jim Dixon with 10 points.

The NCHC was won by Tony Buffa and his 14 points.

Mark Lewin took the Atlantic Hockey race with 18 points.

The Big Ten wound up as a five-way tie among Jim Dixon, Charlie Shub,
Nathan Hampton, Andy Weise, and Mark Lewin, each with 16 points.  The
first tiebreaker gave the crown to Jim Dixon.

Complete scoring results are below.  Congratulations to all the winners,
and thanks again to all those who participated.

Tiebreaker notes:  The first tiebreaker was the difference between your
predicted championship-game score and the actual score.  Thus, if you
picked the score of the ECAC championship game (actually 4-1) to be 2-1,
you would get two points; if you picked 2-0, you would get three points;
and if you picked 6-4, you would get five points.  Obviously, the lower the
point score the better.

The second tiebreaker was the difference between your predicted total of
goals scored in the entire tournament and the actual number.  Again, the
lower the point total the better.

As far as tiebreakers that were actually needed:

For the Big Ten, the championship game score was 2-1.

The USCHO prognosticators' numbers are included below, as are the "Higher
Seed" picks showing what would have happened if the higher seed for each
game had been picked to win.


OVERALL
NAME                   TOTAL
Mark Lewin              76
Charlie Shub            74
Jim Dixon               74
Scott Kaplan            70
Nathan Hampton          70
Bill Fenwick            70
Tony Buffa              70
William Sangrey         68
Andy Weise              62
* Rick McAdoo           60
* Sean Keller           56
* Bill Krebs            50

USCHO                   76
Higher Seed             76

* Did not submit picks for all conferences



ECAC                            Hockey East
NAME                   TOTAL    NAME                   TOTAL
William Sangrey         22      Charlie Shub            20
Scott Kaplan            20      Jim Dixon               18
Rick McAdoo             20      Tony Buffa              16
Jim Dixon               20      Bill Krebs              16
Nathan Hampton          18      William Sangrey         16
Mark Lewin              18      Scott Kaplan            14
Bill Fenwick            18      Nathan Hampton          14
Sean Keller             18      Bill Fenwick            14
Tony Buffa              16      Andy Weise              14
Charlie Shub            16      Mark Lewin              14
Andy Weise              16      Sean Keller             12
Bill Krebs              14      Rick McAdoo             10

USCHO                   22      USCHO                   14
Higher Seed             18      Higher Seed             18


WCHA                            NCHC
NAME                   TOTAL    NAME                   TOTAL
Jim Dixon               10      Tony Buffa              14
Mark Lewin               8      Scott Kaplan            12
Charlie Shub             8      Mark Lewin              12
Nathan Hampton           8      Bill Fenwick            10
Bill Krebs               8      Charlie Shub             8
Bill Fenwick             8      Nathan Hampton           8
Andy Weise               6      Rick McAdoo              8
Tony Buffa               6      Sean Keller              8
Scott Kaplan             6      Jim Dixon                8
Rick McAdoo              6      William Sangrey          8
William Sangrey          6      Andy Weise               8
Sean Keller              6
                                 USCHO                   14
USCHO                   10      Higher Seed             10
Higher Seed             10


Atlantic Hockey                 Big Ten                      Tiebreaker 1
NAME                   TOTAL    NAME                   TOTAL  Score Pts
Mark Lewin              18      Jim Dixon                6     4-1   2
Nathan Hampton          16      Charlie Shub             6     4-2   3
Bill Fenwick            16      Nathan Hampton           6     4-2   3
Rick McAdoo             16      Andy Weise               6     5-2   4
Charlie Shub            16      Mark Lewin               6     6-5   8
William Sangrey         14      Bill Fenwick             4
Scott Kaplan            14      Scott Kaplan             4
Tony Buffa              14      Tony Buffa               4
Jim Dixon               12      William Sangrey          2
Sean Keller             12      Bill Krebs               2
Andy Weise              12
Bill Krebs              10      USCHO                    2
                                 Higher Seed              6
USCHO                   14
Higher Seed             14


Bill Fenwick
[log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2