HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Mar 2017 06:42:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (135 lines)
With the conference post-season tournaments over and the NCAA tournament
almost upon us, it's time to announce the winners of the Pick the Post-
Season Tournament contests.  For Contest #1, in which the later rounds
were weighted more than the earlier ones, the overall winner is...

       Scott Kaplan

whose total of 204 points was nine better than runner-up Charlie Shub.
Congratulations to Scott on his remarkable prognosticating skills and his
overall knowledge of college hockey, not to mention luck (well, OK, I’ll
mention it – luck :-)

As for the individual conference winners...

The ECAC race went to William Sangrey with 62 points.

Charlie Shub won Hockey East with 57 points.

Jim Dixon’s 33 points were good for the top spot in the WCHA.

The top spot in the NCHC went to Scott Kaplan with 40 points.

Mark Lewin took the prize in Atlantic Hockey with 55 points.

The Big Ten saw a five-way tie among Jim Dixon, Charlie Shub, Nathan
Hampton, Andy Weise, and Mark Lewin, with 16 points each.  Jim won the
crown on the first tie-breaker.

Complete scoring results are below.  Congratulations to all the winners,
and thanks again to all those who participated.

Tiebreaker notes:  The first tiebreaker was the difference between your
predicted championship-game score and the actual score.  Thus, if you
picked the score of the ECAC championship game (actually 4-1) to be 2-1,
you would get two points; if you picked 2-0, you would get three points;
and if you picked 6-4, you would get five points.  Obviously, the lower the
point score the better.

The second tiebreaker was the difference between your predicted total of
goals scored in the entire tournament and the actual number.  Again, the
lower the point total the better.

As far as tiebreakers that were actually needed:

For the Big Ten, the championship game score was 2-1.

The USCHO prognosticators' numbers are included below, as are the "Higher
Seed" picks showing what would have happened if the higher seed for each
game had been picked to win.  It should be noted that the USCHO staff did
not pick the games all at once, the way the rest of us did, which in some
cases was especially advantageous.


OVERALL
NAME                   TOTAL
Scott Kaplan            204
Charlie Shub            195
Mark Lewin              193
Nathan Hampton          190
Jim Dixon               186
Bill Fenwick            185
William Sangrey         178
Andy Weise              171
Tony Buffa              154
* Sean Keller           149
* Rick McAdoo           143
* Bill Krebs            103

USCHO                   217
Higher Seed             192

* Did not submit picks for all conferences



ECAC                            Hockey East
NAME                   TOTAL    NAME                   TOTAL
William Sangrey         62      Charlie Shub            57
Jim Dixon               57      William Sangrey         44
Scott Kaplan            56      Nathan Hampton          43
Rick McAdoo             54      Andy Weise              43
Bill Fenwick            54      Scott Kaplan            42
Nathan Hampton          50      Sean Keller             39
Sean Keller             47      Jim Dixon               37
Andy Weise              46      Bill Krebs              35
Charlie Shub            39      Tony Buffa              33
Mark Lewin              38      Mark Lewin              31
Tony Buffa              32      Bill Fenwick            29
Bill Krebs              29      Rick McAdoo             19

USCHO                   63      USCHO                   42
Higher Seed             50      Higher Seed             51


WCHA                            NCHC
NAME                   TOTAL    NAME                   TOTAL
Jim Dixon               33      Scott Kaplan            40
Charlie Shub            18      Mark Lewin              39
Bill Krebs              18      Tony Buffa              36
Nathan Hampton          15      Bill Fenwick            34
Mark Lewin              14      Charlie Shub            20
Bill Fenwick            14      Nathan Hampton          20
Tony Buffa              11      Andy Weise              16
William Sangrey         11      Sean Keller             15
Andy Weise              10      Jim Dixon               15
Scott Kaplan            10      Rick McAdoo             14
Rick McAdoo             10      William Sangrey         14
Sean Keller             10
                                 USCHO                   43
USCHO                   29      Higher Seed             23
Higher Seed             22


Atlantic Hockey                 Big Ten                      Tiebreaker 1
NAME                   TOTAL    NAME                   TOTAL  Score Pts
Mark Lewin              55      Jim Dixon               16     4-1   2
Nathan Hampton          46      Charlie Shub            16     4-2   3
Bill Fenwick            46      Nathan Hampton          16     4-2   3
Rick McAdoo             46      Andy Weise              16     5-2   4
Charlie Shub            45      Mark Lewin              16     6-5   8
Scott Kaplan            44      Scott Kaplan            12
William Sangrey         43      Tony Buffa              12
Andy Weise              40      Bill Fenwick             8
Sean Keller             38      William Sangrey          4
Tony Buffa              30      Bill Krebs               4
Jim Dixon               28
Bill Krebs              17      USCHO                    4
                                 Higher Seed             16
USCHO                   36
Higher Seed             30


Bill Fenwick
[log in to unmask] 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2