Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:59:44 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
so if you walked on (like John Curry and Garth Snow)
does that mean that you do not ever get a scholarship?
If Curry, the all american did not have a scholarship
I would be surprised, I can believe that Curry the 3rd
stringer did not have one.
I know a player who was offered a 3 year deal, pending
the outcome of his first year at Merrimack.... maybe
that is another way that teams offer less-than full
rides.
--- Deron Treadwell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I am pretty sure that Garth Snow was not originally
> given a scholarship, but
> in fact walked on to the team initially.
>
> Also, I am all for bringing in as much quality
> talent. If Darling is worthy
> of a full ride, I say give it to him regardless of
> whether Ben comes back or
> not. I also agree with Jim, Ben is nowhere near
> ready to move on -- but
> that doesn't always stop players.
>
> -Deron
>
>
> On 2/8/08, james acheson <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I am always confused about full scholarships, I
> have
> > NEVER heard anyone mention that anyone was on a
> > paritial scholarship. I know that the team only
> gets
> > about 18 full scholarships to offer and can split
> them
> > up however it likes, so that means that 1/3 of
> the
> > boys are on full scholarships and the rest are on
> half
> > scholarships (maybe).
> >
> > I cannot imagine that both Snow and Dunham were
> not on
> > Full sholarships though. Ditto Doyle and Howard
> (but
> > I do not know)
> >
> > I have heard a funny story about a player whose
> family
> > was very wealthy but whose father really wanted to
> be
> > able to brag about his son being on a hockey
> > shcolarhip to the U of M. SO he made a deal with
> > Shawn to give the boy something like a $10
> sholarship
> > and the rest was paid in cash. (He did play in
> the
> > NHL, so it would have been a reasonable person to
> > choose for a full ride.) (and I am leaving details
> out
> > intentionally).
> >
> > That said.
> > I do not see a reason why the team cannot carry
> two
> > goalies on full scholarship, but as I was saying,
> I do
> > not see a place for Ben to go just yet.
> > --- Spiros Polemis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > I was asking because the article on Darling
> mentioned
> > afull scholarship.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
|
|
|