HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Abegg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:08:45 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Now could someone please explain runner advancement under the infield fly
rule???????

tee-hee

Mike A

Hambone wrote:
> What would be the case if the puck is hit by another skater's stick or
> skate
> after the penalty expires and then crosses the end line?  Seems the ruling
> is inconsistent with the end of a game determining when a goal is scored.
> In that case, the time of the shot is not the determining factor but when
> the puck crosses the goal line.  In either case, the shooter is firing the
> puck before the expiration of time, whether it be a penalty expiring or a
> game ending.
>
> Hambone
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wayne T Smith <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 12:32 PM
> Subject: Icing rules question
>
>
>>With the recent fine question and answers on DQs, I'll pitch in with a
>>new question ...
>>
>>In a UMaine game this past weekend, Team A, with their man-down time
>>about to expire, fires the puck for the length of the ice.  Before the
>>puck crosses the goal line extended, however, the penalty time expires
>>and Team A returns to full strength.
>>
>>Question: Was icing whistled or waived off?
>>
>>(I must admit, it's been so long since I've seen this situation, I'd
>>forgotten the correct call!)
>>
>>
>>cheers, wayne
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2