Friday, October 20, 2000, 3:23:35 PM - Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine wrote:
WM> I can only lament the impoverishment of a mind that has nothing more to say
WM> than "nonsense" to something he obviously knows nothing about.
I see. The way Confucius was fool. I thought that you should call poor
of mind one that says more words then enough. And to know someone's
state of mind and scope of knowledge by the one word -- that is really
some magic.
To proceed further: Charles is not "poor of mind". So we see you
making wrong sentence. Being so quick in making wrong sentences hardly
gives your other words a big authority.
And the fact that you make some stuff for sale doesn't either. That is
not to give any offence, but you should really understand that if you
want make someone take notice of your words some better way than
talking about 'cheap editions' and 'consulting sources' should be
used.
If we were communists someone talking about innate similarity of Lenin
and Jesus Christ which he discovered writing books for some 'popular
library' would hardly give a good impression.
mailto:[log in to unmask]
///For imprints which are left by the movements of animals are called "traces"
visit http://russ.ru/authors/nikiforov.html