Friday, October 20, 2000, 3:23:35 PM - Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine wrote: WM> I can only lament the impoverishment of a mind that has nothing more to say WM> than "nonsense" to something he obviously knows nothing about. I see. The way Confucius was fool. I thought that you should call poor of mind one that says more words then enough. And to know someone's state of mind and scope of knowledge by the one word -- that is really some magic. To proceed further: Charles is not "poor of mind". So we see you making wrong sentence. Being so quick in making wrong sentences hardly gives your other words a big authority. And the fact that you make some stuff for sale doesn't either. That is not to give any offence, but you should really understand that if you want make someone take notice of your words some better way than talking about 'cheap editions' and 'consulting sources' should be used. If we were communists someone talking about innate similarity of Lenin and Jesus Christ which he discovered writing books for some 'popular library' would hardly give a good impression. mailto:[log in to unmask] ///For imprints which are left by the movements of animals are called "traces" visit http://russ.ru/authors/nikiforov.html