my understanding of the rule is that the stick cannot come from above the 4'
height and then contact the puck at or below 4 feet.  It is still considered
to have been played with a high stick.

It looked like the right call to me.  It looked like the stick contacted the
puck above 4 feet anyway even without the stick coming from above 4 ft
issue.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Custom Video Services" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 2:16 PM
Subject: Re: UNH-Cornell: One Period Done


> From what I saw on replay the puck hit the blade of the stick which
> was just under chest high at that moment (the stick was going down at
> the time). I thought it was a goal but hey what do I know? They took
> enough time to look at it.
>
> Jay
>
> >
> >
> >So how is this goal waived off? The call on the ice was clearly a good
goal,
> >so Shepherd overruled the call on the ice. I'm very confused. It's not
clear
> >to me that they got this one right, unlike almost every other use of the
TV
> >replay.
> >
> >
> >
> >Patrick
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jay Punwar
> Custom Video Services
> Madison, WI
> 608.223.9499
>