EPOUND-L Archives

- Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine

EPOUND-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Carrol Cox <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
- Ezra Pound discussion list of the University of Maine <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:06:24 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Richard Seddon wrote:
>
> Dirk:
>
> The essay by Fenellosa (edited by Pound) has an extensive analysis of verbs
> and nouns especially in the context of the Chinese ideograph.
>
> I'll give you one quote which, perhaps, is germane to our discussion.
>
> "A true noun, an isolated thing, does not exist in nature.  Things are only
> the terminal point, or rather the meeting points, of actions, cross-sections
> cut through actions, snapshots.  Neither can a pure verb, an abstract
> motion, be possible in nature.  The eye sees noun and verb as one; things in
> motion, motion in things, and so the Chinese conception tends to represent
> them." (page 10)
>

Try out for the fun of it the following as a paraphrase of this quote
from Fenellosa: "One divides into two, NOT Two combine into one."

Carrol

> Rick Seddon
> McIntosh, NM

ATOM RSS1 RSS2