HOCKEY-L Archives

- Hockey-L - The College Hockey Discussion List

Hockey-L@LISTS.MAINE.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jeffrey A. Partnow" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jeffrey A. Partnow
Date:
Mon, 17 Apr 2000 10:24:10 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
on 4/17/00 1:20 PM, Anthony J. Buffa at [log in to unmask] wrote:
 
> Contrary to the naysayers, Anaheim was not that bad. Most of the folks
> were knowledgeable and the games drew very well, and there were no major
> gliches that I saw.
>
> I would think Orlando would make a great venue. So would the Shark Tank
> in San Jose :-)
=====Reply=====
I have to agree. The only fly in the ointment was Anaheim's decision to
re-do all the roads at the time of the Tournament, given the fact that the
Pond was barely within walking distance from its own parking lots, let alone
the rest of Orange County.
 
I thought that the Pond was a terrific venue, and the crowds (about
14-15,000 in a 17,000 seat arena) were good. Given that 4/5s of the
attendees were either affiliated with the schools, members of Hockey-l, or
Mighty Duck season ticket holders, there was no lack of hockey knowledge
among the spectators.
 
Given the evangelistic bent of many college hockey fans, as well as the
grossly insufficient seating available in Providence this year, I should
think that most (if not all) of us would favor large venues in interesting
locales that could become hockey hotbeds in the future. Assuming that the
ice-making machinery works.
--jeff partnow
--Fairbanks
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2