Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Aug 2000 08:08:31 +0100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It warms the cockles of my heart to know how deeply concerned you are for maintaining a close adherence to topicality Wei. And what you may or may not have read is of no concern to me--if you do not like my criticisms of you, as I said at the close of my post which you so carefully did not read, then find a new topic. Better still (since I know you'll never do that, just as I know you'll read this)then, that you not only do not read them but further, do not reply to them. It shall add greatly to your already substantial aura.
M Deporres
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 04:42:24 GMT En Lin Wei <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
When I reached the following part of the post, I decided it was not
necessary to read any further.
". . .reminds me of a cocktail party I once attended at the Tate."
I judged that what someone may or may not have observed at a cocktail party,
no matter where it was, could be deemed irrelevant, and that it might be
akin to gossip, or a highly subjective interpretation of events which have
no bearing on the discussion of Ezra Pound.
|
|
|