> Ben Flickinger wrote: > > > I am not saying that (although it would be nice), but I also think the WCHA > > owes us more than what they're giving us right now, which is dead silence > > since Tech decided to stay. > [reformated for clarity] > And exactly what do you want the WCHA to say? I agree with that. > We've gone over all the > reasons why they aren't going to go ahead and invite you right now. I think it is reasonable for the WCHA to talk with UNO, and I expect that they will, probably at the coaches meetings this spring. > What else do you want them to tell you? Like it > or not, UNO is only going to join the WCHA by following the same rules > and procedures that everyone else has. Unless the league changes the rules and procedures. They aren't set in stone, but changing them is a delicate process. Maybe they will, maybe they won't. > If UNO can't live with that, > than by all means, join the CCHA. I still think that that's not a > bright move, but it's up to you guys. But is isn't up to J. Michael Neal to tell you that on behalf of anyone except himself. I agree with the second half -- I think UNO should (and probably will) end up in the WCHA. I think this topic has been beaten to death. How long until the next face off? --david HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.