On Wed, 14 Jan 1998 14:47:58 -0500 wrote... >At 11:44 AM 1/14/98 -0800, you wrote: >> shoot--did some folk get it as computer code? sorry. It was an enclosure sent to me--I hate to deal with enclosures at all, but thought this spoof of post-modernism and post-modernists worth the effort. I think I sent it binhex, which is the default option on my computer software. Everyone should read this IMMEDIATELY -- it's spectacularly funny! >> >>Thanks, Robert, for providing evidence that my old graduate school buddy >>Mark Leyner is still capable of hilarity -- and would one of you >>cross-posters from the poetics list transfer it over there as well? >> >> > >Was the joke that it was computer code -- hence, unreadable? > >(":#9""8P3d,P4B9!"849K869G*53#3"#B@!*!%F#%0#L"(CA*KE'4[,#"&BA3J@@p" etc.) > >Anyway, that's what I and maybe others got in our inboxes.... > >Greg Downing/NYU, at [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask] > > Robert E. Kibler Department of English University of Minnesota [log in to unmask] fortunatus et ille, deos qui novit agrestis, Panaque Silvanumque senem Nymphasque sorores.