Greg Berge wrote: > > As much as I loathe the NC$$, I can't see any reason why there'd > be a "conspiracy" against hockey. Although I didn't intend to imply "conspiracy" I can see where you thought that's what I meant. That said, however, I really wonder what the reason could be? Why does the NC$$ treat college hockey as if it is a zit? I think that the generic hockey fans of the country WOULD watch - say - a game of the week, as was shown by my father in law. Hockey fans LIKE HOCKEY, period. > All of this makes me very happy, of course, since my well-documented > attitude towards greater exposure is "screw THAT." But however you > look at it, it just isn't going to happen; the point, she is moot. Although I agree that greater exposure probably isn't in the cards, I'm not so sure that the screw THAT attitude is necessarily best. I want to have the opportunity to watch Clarkson play hockey on TV. I can't. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Kahn "I swear by my life and my love of it, that I Xyplex Inc. will never live for the sake of another man, Littleton, MA nor ask another man to live for mine." e-mail: [log in to unmask] -John Galt et al ------------------------------------------------------------------------ HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.