Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.
On Tue, 23 Apr 1996, Dave Hendrickson wrote: > JohnH wrote: > > I'm making an effort to drop the Amherst from UMass > > because that's what the good folks at UMass seem to prefer. > > Hey, John, stop making the effort. Folks at UMass-Lowell *want* UMass-Amherst > to stay exactly that. Calling them "UMass" gives a token of legitimacy to > their chants of "We're the *real* UMass" at UML-UMA games. Hockey East has > deferred to Lowell in this regard, calling the two schools "Mass-Lowell" and > "Mass-Amherst" despite requests out of Amherst to be called "UMass". Funny, I don't think I ever heard people on CBS call us "UMass-Amherst" during the Final Four. Ditto for ESPN, ABC, etc. Even in hockey, I'll point out that the Globe uses just "UMass" in its game sumaries, abbreviating the two schools as "UM" and "UML" in the scoring summary when they face each other. Every organization in the world has it right except for some nit-wits in Lowell. The fact of the matter is that the Amherst campus is the "main" branch of the university system, with over 22,000 students as opposed to a handful of thousands at the others. Having been to four of the five campuses at one point or another I'll attest that it has the best facilities, faculty and clearly the most money pumped into it. In all other states that have such a branch of the system, that branch is identified athletically by just the state name, even when they compete in the same league. I've yet to hear a Duluth person bitch about it not being Minnesota-Twin Cities. Funny, I don't hear much on this list about the "UMTC Gophers." Personally I won't even consider this insestulent whining by Lowell fans and administrators in general (nothing personal Dave, I mean Lowell people, not specifically you, you're a good guy in my book) until Lowell actually puts the word "UMass" somewhere visible on its uniform. It really ticks me off that they insist on this campus being referred to as UMass-Amherst, when they do not acknoledge their membership in the state U system on their sweaters. The UMass sweaters meanwhile use the exact same logo that appears on the uniforms of every one of our other 29 varsity teams, none of which are ever referred to as "Amherst." To us Amherst is that D3 school across town that wears purple and goes by the moniker "Lord Jeffs." I respect the hell out of Bruce Crowder, sticking up so passionatly for the Amherst thing. He's a tremendous coach and a great guy away from the rink, but he takes it too far sometimes. I completely disagree with him. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts legislature identifies the Amherst campus as the main branch of the state university system, while Lowell, Boston, Dartmouth and Worcester are identified as "satellite campuses." As such, UMass-Amherst deserves the respect of having the location dropped from the title. Across the nation, from Florida"-Gainesville" to Idaho"-Moscow" this is the case. I wonder what Calipari thinks about all this. Although it pains me to see the name used, at least those of us in Amherst can at least take comfort in knowing that being called "UMass-Amherst" by Jim Seavey and Co. couldn't stop us from winning the UMass Alumni Cup in only our second D1 year :-)))))))) A very passionate Leigh [log in to unmask] Just a partial disclaimer on this one, because for the most part this IS the opinion of my various employers. HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.