I saw the goal on ESPN2 in a sports bar with no sound, first live and then from several replay angles. Here is what I saw, and why I think (despite having rooted for the Cats) that the call was correct. 1. A CC player (the one ultimately credited with the assist), while falling forward in the crease, swats the rebound with his glove and intentionally redirects the puck down towards the goal. 2. The puck deflects off of Thomas' leg and settles on the ice outside of the goal line. 3. A VERMONT player attempts to clear the puck but deflects it into his own net off of Thomas' skate / ankle. Remackle never touched the puck; he was credited with the goal because he was the nearest CC player on an own-goal. The puck was not thrown into the net, nor was it a hand-pass (because it was the unfortunate UVM player who touched it after the swat, and not a CC teammate). Therefore, it was a legal goal. Thing is, I have now read several hockey-l posts and heard the ESPN wrap-up of the goal and read the Boston Globe review of the game, and nobody else on the planet seems to have seen that it was a Vermont player, and not Remackle, who put the puck in. But there was absolutely no doubt in my mind on at least 2 of the 4 or 5 angles I have seen the goal from (inevitably, all the news and ESPN replays I saw featured the most inconclusive of the angles). Greg R. Berge HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.