If holding first round and possibly q-final matches on campus extends the tourney to 3 weekends (allowing travel time), is that necessarily a bad thing. 1) It allows the option of 2 out of 3 series - totally optional and to be debated separately, but at least it becomes an option. It cannot even be considered under the current one weekend system. **2) Most importantly - Most of us agree that College Hockey deserves more publicity and that better national TV coverage of the Final Four is a big step. Having it a week after the b-ball Final Four, instead of competing against it, can only help. How many more people would have watched the "game-of-the century" between Maine and Michigan last year if it was not up against a Final Four b-ball game? Getting more people to see games like that one is the easiest way to grow the sport. Thoughts and comments... Greg Weintraub HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.