Error during command authentication.

Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.

In article <[log in to unmask]>,
Ken Pavelle <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> ECAC Tournament:
>>   Omit #11-#12; then 7 vs 10 and 8 vs 9 single game;
>>     reseed then 1 vs 8, 2 vs 7, 3 vs 6, and 4 vs 5;
>>     2 out of 3 with 5 minute overtime in 1st 2 games;
>>     reseed, then; 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3; then consolation and final.
>
>Question about the 2/3 with 5 minute overtimes.  Does this mean as many
>5 minute overtimes as needed to determine a winner?
 
If I'm not mistaken only one 5 minute overtime in the first 2 games.
>
>If not, what happens when:
>        Game 1, tie
>        Game 2, team A wins
>        Game 3, team B wins
>
>Is this where the 6 tiebreaker rules come into effect, or are they for
>determining seeds only?
 
        In the scenario you have team A wins after Game 2.  Only 3 points are
needed for an overall victory.  (Win=2, Tie=1)  However, if the series points
are matched going into the third game (team A wins, team B wins, or 2 ties)
the third game is played to completion. I believe with 20 minute OT's.  Perhaps
shoot-outs if it goes long enough(speculation).  But in any case, only 3 points
are needed to win the series.
 
        Now a new question:
        Have any of the series since this 3point, 3game playoff started tied in
the first two games? I know the split win is pretty common.  Also does anyone
know for sure the 3rd game completion rules?
 
        Chris Schierer
                RPI '95
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute -- 1995 ECAC Men's Ice Hockey Champions
 
        GO GO GO YOU RED RED RED!
                        FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT YOU WHITE WHITE WHITE!
 
HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey;  send information to
[log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.