Regarding Michigan and Minnesota, John Haeussler stated that: "...the general consensus among the Michigan section was that the Wolverines would win 7 of 10 if they played on a regular basis." Why? What evidence to support this "consensus" can you present? Now, if you were to ask a section of Minnesota fans at a hockey game the same question, they would probably say that Minnesota would win 8 or 9 out of 10 games, but the Minnesota fans would have a reason for saying that. The past few years have shown how Minnesota/Michigan games usually turn out. I don't recall Michigan being in the NCAA Final Four in the past few years? Why? Wasn't Minnesota there? Oh yeah, they were. I hope not all Michigan fans think as John Haeussler does. Although I'm a Minnesota fan, I admit the truth: For example, I would never say that Minnesota would beat Boston Univ. or Colorado College 7 of 10 games if they played on a regular basis. Why? Because I'm being realistic, not a blind fan. HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.