Thanks to Ryan for an accounting of the Maine infractions. I remain convinced that these infractions are basically small potatoes. The University (and perhaps the NCAA) are right to come down hard in this case -- small potatoes or not -- but I'm concerned about an over-reaction. About a year or two ago the Hartford Courant ran an expose on big-time football as experienced by an outstanding CT player who had gone out to the midwest to a certain school ranked annually in the top ten. This school has a very good reputation. What was described was an atmosphere where football players regularly received "honoraria" of $100 bills for putting in cameo appearances at university cocktail parties. Where stars from very humble financial backgrounds ran around in expensive cars. And on and on .... And, to my knowledge, the NCAA has never investigated this particular institution! That is the frame of reference I use when I think about the Maine affair. So I guess I'm not too impressed by the conclusions of the Maine investigation. I think they did a very thorough job. I think the punishments are severe and appropriate. But I don't see a pattern of blatant abuse which should tarnish the institution. And I'm not sure about the national championship thing. The Dunham situation is too trivial to mention unless large sums were involved. And from the posts, it looks like Ingram was ineligible the year previous to 92/93 -- or am I missing something? Perhaps the most serious charge relates to Shawn's $1,200. I suppose his detractors will claim that he invented the explanation ex post facto, but if there were no evidence to the contrary he would be gone by now. Maine would simply not let him stay when their consultants knew darn well that the NCAA was going to can him. So, good clean-up job, Maine. Lets get back to the game. -- Dick Tuthill HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.