>>>>> " " == Eric J Burton <[log in to unmask]> writes: > On Wed, 29 Nov 1995, John Haeussler wrote: >> -- Minnesota is the best team Michigan has faced this season. >> That said, the general consensus among the Michigan section was >> that the Wolverines would win 7 of 10 if they played on a regular >> basis. I'd be interested in *why* you came to this conclusion! > this is where I think you are wrong the gophers have beat > the wolverines 2 games in a row and you have nothing to base this > on. First, that's two games in a row over a two year period. Last year's results have no bearing in this discussion. His statement, which I don't necessarily agree with, was about this year's versions of the two teams. I'm guessing he was basing it on total shots, or just a feeling on who was carrying the play. But I didn't see the game, so I really don't know who carried the play. > The Wcha is pound per pound a better conference, I think this > why you saw some many teams in the Playoffs from our Division. Talk about having nothing on which to base a statement! Please, I'd be very interested in your detailed analysis that proves that the wcha is pound per pound (whatever the heck that means) a better conference than the ccha. Anxiously awaiting your further explanation, -Alan Harder [log in to unmask] Go Blue! HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.