>>>>> " " == Deron Treadwell <[log in to unmask]> writes: > It was definately the fact that the game wasn't that > interesting.. *smile*. Yeah, I didn't care one whit! ;-) > I think it's a lot of things. I don't know > if the game was blackout in Michigan, perhaps it should have been > TV wise (not so much by my opinion, but could have been a reason > for poor attendence). It was *not* blacked out, and that might be a contributing factor for poor attendance. Why would anyone drive way out to Auburn Hills from Ann Arbor when they could watch it on their local cable? > Perhaps many people lost some interest when Michigan lost to Western? Nah, that was a fluke, and us true-blue-ers know it. ;-) > I personally can't talk about a drive, > because I have no idea about Michigan, never having been there in > my life. You should come visit! The northern and western parts of the state are especially beautiful. > It could also be that it's World Series time. Baseball over hockey? Not on your life! > I also agree with whomever said > that Michigan's team defense won the game, having mulled over the > loss for a day, I would concur with that statement as well. --- Yep, UM's offense isn't really clicking yet. Getting Brendan Morrison back should help. -Alan Harder [log in to unmask] Go Blue! The above commentary, which does not *even* represent the opinion of the American Mathematical Society, is sold by weight, not by volume. Some settling of the contents may have occurred during shipping. HOCKEY-L is for discussion of college ice hockey; send information to [log in to unmask], The College Hockey Information List.