On Wed, 22 Mar 1995, Alan Harder wrote: > >>>>> " " == Arthur Berman <[log in to unmask]> writes: > > > Obviously you are entitled to your opinion, but the convention, I > > believe for all conferences in Div. I, is to designate the > > tournament winner the league champion, and the regular season > > winner is just that. I have posted my feelings about not letting > > everyone into the tournaments before so won't get into them again. > > However, we should not post the way we feel things *should* be as > > facts, but as opinions. This is a discussion group after all :-) > > Okay, you're probably right. LSSU is the CCHA champion, and Michigan > is the Regular season champion. It is a *fact* that my *opinion* is > that the regular season championship means a great deal more than > postseason money, er, tournament does. So, in my opinion, LSSU can > call themselves the CCHA champs, and the CCHA can call LSSU the CCHA > champs, and everyone involved in college hockey can call LSSU the CCHA > champs, but us UM fans know who the *real* CCHA champs were this year. > > But I'm probably just a wee little bit biased. > > > -Alan Harder > [log in to unmask] > Go Blue! > We're not too particular whether we're called League Champs or Playoff Champs or just Champs. That trophy looks pretty cool with the rest of them! Tim LSSU '88 GO LAKERS!!!!