On Wed, 15 Mar 1995, David Blackburn wrote: > Brown's > penalties are almost always roughing, hitting from behind, hitting after > the whistle, charging, etc. *not* "clutch and grab" penalties like > interference and holding (except when they retalitory aginst Princeton's > holding). If this is true I'm glad Princeton won, you've basically said that Brown are a bunch of cheap shots. I am not saying this, I haven't seen them play at all this year. > That's it. I'm out. I hope I convinced *somebody* of what our argument > is and that we are not whining because we didn't win. I'm sorry, but that is what it sounds like. I've kept out of this because I have only seen one ECAC game this year, not involving either team, but it seems to me that if Brown was so skilled they would have won in a three game series. A good team always has some team that may not look good on paper but matches up well with them. This is the case for Merrimack with BU. (Mike, I am not saying here that Merrimack is not a good team :-)) It seems Princeton knew what to do to beat Brown, and Brown was unwilling or unable to adjust. Arthur Berman [log in to unmask] GO BU!!!