Error during command authentication.
Error - unable to initiate communication with LISTSERV (errno=111). The server is probably not started.
By now everyone has heard the stories about the brutal weekend series between Brown and Princeton in which three games were decided by one goal. Though, like other Brown fans, I love to hate Princeton in all sports (and I feel I can say this with a greater modicum of legitimacy than most since I am a Princeton alum), I have to tip my hat to the Tigers who held on during a long weekend series at an unfriendly arena to win game N#3. I disagree with those who have written in to deny than Princeton's clear strategy in game 3 was to clutch and grab and take Brown's considerable skating advantage away as well as to brutalize Trach and Mulhern each time they touched the puck.I haven't missed a home game at Meehan Auditorium in four years and this strategy is well known to Brown fans as well as to Gaudet. Why Brown only chooses to respond by clutching and grabbing in turn is another question. But anyone who follows Brown hockey has come to dread teams who chose to play the way Princeton did on Sunday. No wonder Gaudet has been trying of late to bring in bigger and bigger players. I was stunned in the 5th period on Sunday (as was the loyal contingent of Brown faculty and administrators I was with) when Matt Brush (N#12) of Princeton scored the winning goal. Although he needed only five or so strides to reach Audette after picking the puck away from Brown defenders, he bolted like lightning toward the goal. Did this guy have fresh legs at this point? Can any Princeton people tell me more about what line he plays on and how much time he played in that third game? I'm interested from a coach's perspective whether this kid was deliberately put in in that period because he was otherwise rested. Good luck to the Tigers in Lake Placid. -- Armando Bengochea [log in to unmask]