In article <[log in to unmask]>, Jayson Moy <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Therefore, the 2 teams from the ECAC should be Clarkson and, this is >assuming that Clarkson makes the final, whomever wins the other semifinal. >There is plenty of room for Colgate and RPI to move up in to the Top 15 >of the RPICH and justify this. Teams losing in the quarterfinals will not >be considered, even though Vermont and Brown are close to the >Top 12 in the RPICH. If Clarkson beats Princeton by a smaller margin than they win the final game, it'll be tough to discount Princeton as a possible biddee if they finish third, especially considering how high Princeton is in the RPICH. If nothing else, Princeton will add some excitement- they're the kind of team that can beat anyone on a good day (as Maine people will tell you). I still can't understand how they finished with such a poor ECAC record- I know they beat Brown, Harvard, and RPI during the season. Did they just play poorly against the lower-level teams? -- - Andrew Brecher ([log in to unmask]) <insert disclaimer here>