Just a few thoughts on today's postings: >Subject: Brown 3 - UML 3 >Lowell had leads of 2-0 and 3-2 before ending up with a tie at >Brown last night. This game was pretty unremarkable - it >looked to me that both teams had the "this is the last >non-conference game of the year before we hit the >home-stretch, let's coast through this one" attitude. This >attitude may have been a bit more prevelant among the Lowell >team as they lookked VERY sloppy at times. I was a little >dissapointed in the lackadaisicalness (is that a word?), >because, in my mind, it was an important game for both >teams. I couldn't agree more with the fact that the game was important. Don't these guys know about the power ratings? [log in to unmask] . wrote: >We turn the spotlight this week on the New Hampshire >Wildcats. A look at the media polls (WMEB and Troy Record) >shows that, while the polls are similar, HOCKEY-L is taking >more notice of New Hampshire than the other polls are: > Troy HOCKEY-L WMEB Record > Team Record Rank Rank Rank >New Hampshire 15-5-3 7 10 10 >This week's ratings composite (note that the computerized >rankings aren't letting the Wildcats go by unnoticed): > HOCKEY-L RPICH CHODR KRACH HEAL > Team Record Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank >New Hampshire 15-5-3 7 6 9 5 6 It's about time someone noticed the 'Cats!! Andrew Weise <[log in to unmask]> comments on Chaz Scoggins' poll as follows: >Chaz should also take a look at where he put Clarkson (6) & >New Hampshire (7). The Wildcats beat Clarkson twice this >season, where both teams were playing real well at each >time. Go figure.... Polls, polls, polls,...... Despite Mike M's thoughtful response comparing UNH's (3-2-1, Mike, not 3-3) and Clarkson's (5-1) records over the last 6 games), UNH's beating Clarkson twice should count for something. I'll try to post UNH-BU results tonight after the game. Karen Ambrose, UNH '72 Go Blue, Beat BU!!