> > Now, my question: Michigan's second goal. The Michigan player broke > into the zone and got off a shot. Callinan caught the puck and then was > knocked into the net by a fallen defensman. I was under the impression > that if the goalie had control of the puck and was then knocked into the > net that there would be no goal, and yet there was a goal awarded on > this play. Does anyone have an explainiation of this ruling? Or was it > ruled that the goalie did not have control of the puck? > I had the exact same impression! But my bro-in-law said he saw the puck come out of Callinan's glove. We'll have to watch for this on the replays, but I didn't see the puck on the ice. How about the go-ahead goal? Did I hear correctly that an assist was given to Callinan? Reed