AFrolik writes: > Mike Machnik writes: > > >had a stronger schedule and performed better against it > >proportionally, but that CC benefited from a weaker >conference > >schedule than some of its opponents (Minnesota) which >allowed it to > >capture the conference title. > > I would like to know how CC had a weaker conference schedule than Minnesota. > Take out head to head games and they should have had the same strength of > schedule in the conference. > The two teams Minnesota only played twice were CC and Michigan Tech. I don't remember who CC's other two-game team was, but it HAD to be stronger than Tech, so Minnesota had to have a stronger in-conference schedule than CC. -Pam