Some random comments & observations(Frigid Four): Lake Superior: 1. What really impressed me was their discipline - starting about midway through the 2nd period BU was playing pretty chippy - an awfull lot of uncalled charging penalties and stick tripping - but LSSU NEVER retaliated. Wisconsin's senior class would have retaliated with slashes and gotten BU back into the game. After the game the announcer stated how tough it is to get the players to play LSSU's form of hockey and you have to give credit to the coach and the players. 2. That face-off play is amazing. Everytime the Boston player would end up tripped and on the ice - with the LSSU blueliner getting an open shot. Do they ever get called for interference or tripping? Did they get away with this all year? 3. Who's going to bet against them next year? Officials 1. I thought they did an outstanding job all tournament. They never affected the outcome of any game. I was really impressed when they weren't afaid to call penalties during the third period of the LSSU/Harvard game. Announcers 1. I was wondering why there was such a difference of opinion on Bob Norton (I hope I got his name right); now I know. He does give some very interesting insights and does know his stuff but at times I found myself yelling shut-up and wishing I was back at a Sports bar with the sound shut off. He gets on these talking binges and just keep going - hockey is exciting enought without the constant chatter. He reminds me of Howard Cosell without the ego - and I still don't know if that is good or bad. Hockey-L Great - with it I get more good information here in California then I did in Northern Wisconsin. Wisconsin - back next year with a lot less talent, a lot less ego's and hopefully a lot more discipline. Thanks for all the great opinions and information Ed Priest