Tony Biscardi writes: >UNH, playing only 3 lines due to recent suspensions, looked tired, especially >in the third. Actually, there was a fourth line (Putnam, Norton, Lenz) out there, but they played very little. >Although BU outshot UNH something like 20-6 in the first, UNH somehow had a 1-0 >lead. I think it was 19-7. UNH was extremely fortunate to be leading after one period. Cavicchi kept the Wildcats in the game. >This was not the same UNH team that I watched (taped it off of chnl 50) beat >Lowell this weekend. Instead of being hungry, they looked listless. Agreed. While I don't think the UNH suspensions were the difference in the game, I couldn't help but wonder how much the incident affected them. If anyone had a reason to be listless, it was BU (with nothing to play for). Chris Go Blue!