I watched both of Harvard's games this weekend, and have a few quick remarks, although the reporting has been very good. (My views are admittedly partisan.) Harvard vs. Union - Union has a lot of character, which I attribute somewhat to strong coaching (former Harvard captain Kevin Sneddon is assistant coach :-). While Harvard consistently outplayed and outskated Union, there was never any sign of the Dutchment letting up. - Both teams were guilty of inconsistent defensive play--in fact, I saw this in both games this weekend, with RPI being just as cupable. These no-look, Paul Coffey-style outlet passes are bad, but so are the aimless, give-it-to-the- other-team passes. I mean, everything can't be perfect, but it seemed particularly aggravated. - Harvard's domination of play was limited by an inability to put the puck away: they continue to be very tentative in front of the net. With their ability, they should and could have made the score higher (sorry Union fans). They easily carry the puck, but lack snipers. - All of Harvard's injured players were back, and I was impressed by freshman Ashlin Halfknight, who I had missed seeing in the game versus Brown. On the other hand, mountainous freshman Ethan Philpott did not play in either weekend games. Whether this is due to injury or demotion (he was a liability in the Brown game), I don't know. Harvard vs. RPI - Remember, my views are partisan, but frankly, I was not impressed with RPI. I haven't seen them play any other games this season, but they looked sloppy and slow to me. The score was more like Tripp Tracy 4-Neil Little 3, with Tracy letting in some very easy ones--not helped by poor coverage by the Harvard defense. I don't wish to be flamed by RPI fans, but seriously, from where I sat, the puck remained in the RPI defensive zone for almost the entire second and third periods, during which Harvard generated 36 shots (48 on the game). That the score wasn't different seemed to me to be more Neil Little and Tripp Tracy's fault. Also, I give the RPI defense credit for jamming up the slot pretty well, and I was boggled by Harvard's refusal to shoot, and refusal to rush the net. They would wheel about, skate around RPI players, and then continue skating. The net, the net! I would yell. There they were, down 4-2, a minute and a half left, goalie pulled, dominating the play (RPI didn't score on the empty net--almost 2:00 minutes worth--because they barely touched the puck during the period), and what does Harvard do? Pass, pass, skate around RPI's zone. I mean sure, RPI's jamming the slot well, but at this point in the game, why not try shooting the darn thing? They finally did, and lo and behold they scored, but far too late. I mean, they had a ton of shots, many of which were from the perimeter, but quite a few from point blank range, but frankly, it could have easily been 60 or so shots from what I saw of the territorial advantage, if Harvard had played it that way. - I think part of this is that Neil Little looked just excellent. He gave no angles, nothing to the the incoming forward. Tracy on the other hand flopped about, lost his stick, etc. He reminds me of Chuckie Hughes. - I'm not saying that Harvard looked great, no, but they consistently outskated RPI. Sure, RPI led the whole game, but it was often by a single goal, and many of the goals came off of breakdowns by Harvard and then poor play by Tracy-- again, not intended as an insult to RPI, but as a comment that I didn't see their forwards carrying the puck, but rather I saw largely opportunistic play (nothing wrong with this, but some of these forwards on RPI are very skilled-- Majic, et al., but they didn't seem coordinated in attack, but waited for the breakdown). If Little weren't such an excellent positional goalie, things would have been different, based on the territorial and shot advantage (at least from my point of view). - But, one can also argue that this is the sign of a talented team: they win even when they play poorly. Fair enough, and RPI does have a lot of talent. They'll go a long way. Sandy Baldwin