The SOS Rating is obtained by adding a team's winning percentage to the aggregate winning percentage of opponents they have faced (not including head-to-head contests with that opponent). NOTE: Mercyurst (2 wins), Hobart (1 win) and Scranton (2 losses) have played games against unknown opponents. While the results of those games are reflected in each teams Win %, their SOS % remains unaffected. SOS ECAC West/SUNYAC Ratings Games through 1/27/93 Ranking Team Rating Win SOS Change Now Prev % % 1 1 Plattsburgh 1.457 .867 .590 +.035 2 2 Mercyhurst 1.379 .800 .579 +.056 3 4 Elmira 1.259 .750 .509 +.064 4 5 Cortland 1.196 .786 .410 +.014 5 3 Cansisius 1.188 .700 .488 -.079 6 6 Hobart 1.172 .667 .505 +.065 7 7 RIT 1.036 .531 .505 -.006 8 8 Oswego 0.959 .531 .428 +.056 9 9 Potsdam 0.951 .458 .513 +.049 10 10 Fredonia 0.903 .400 .503 +.048 11 11 Brockport 0.738 .267 .471 -.022 12 12 Geneseo 0.716 .250 .466 -.026 13 13 St. Bonas 0.580 .125 .455 -.015 14 14 Scranton 0.407 .000 .407 +.002 Based entirely on winning percentages, the standings would be (interesting because these would have been the official standings had the ECAC West stayed intact): Now Prev 1 1 Plattsburgh .867 2 4 Mercyhurst .800 3 3 Cortland .786 4 5 Elmira .750 5 2 Cansisius .700 6 6 Hobart .667 7 8 Oswego .531 7t 7 RIT .531 9 9 Potsdam .458 10 10 Fredonia .400 11 12 Brockport .267 12 11 Geneseo .250 13 13 St. Bonas .125 14 14 Scranton .000 And who's had the toughest (and easiest ) schedule to date? Here they are, hardest to easiest: Now Prev 1 2 Plattsburgh .590 (Opponent's winning %) 2 1 Mercyhurst .579 3 5 Potsdam .514 4 8 Elmira .509 5 3 Hobart .505 5t 6 RIT .505 7 7 Fredonia .503 8 10 Cansisius .488 9 4 Brockport .471 10 9 Geneseo .466 11 11 St. Bonas .455 12 13 Oswego .428 13 14 Cortland .410 14 12 Scranton .405 Chris Lerch Xerox RIT '84 & '91