UAF's loss to BG, combined with Michigan and Miami sweeps, drops the
Nanooks down to #3.
Keith
--------------------
CCHA Rank
A mathematical ranking of the CCHA (members and the affiliate)
By Keith Instone
Includes games on 11/28/92.
League*
Rank Pts Team Record Performance Schedule Rating
1 2 Michigan 6 2 2 40.00 4 20.01 2 60.01
2 1 Miami 9 2 1 58.33 1 -2.28 7 56.05
3 - Alaska-Fairbanks 5 2 0 42.86 3 -0.47 6 42.39
4 2 Lake Superior 6 1 2 55.56 2 -17.35 11 38.21
5 5 Western Michigan 5 3 1 22.22 6 2.63 5 24.86
6 4 Michigan State 6 3 1 30.00 5 -11.39 10 18.61
7 7 Ferris State 2 4 2 -25.00 8 25.32 1 0.32
8 6 Kent 4 6 0 -20.00 7 -9.53 9 -29.53
9 7 Bowling Green 4 7 0 -27.27 9 -5.81 8 -33.09
10 9 Ohio State 2 7 1 -50.00 11 8.52 4 -41.48
11 9 Illinois-Chicago 2 5 1 -37.50 10 -23.44 12 -60.94
12 11 Notre Dame 1 10 1 -75.00 12 11.33 3 -63.67
*The "League record" includes CCHA league games and games with the affiliate,
which are the games that will determine the seedings for the league play-offs.
So far, this includes 58 games. Alaska-Fairbanks will be seeded from 7th to
12th, with the other positions determined by league points.
PERFORMANCE is based on won-lost record only; game sites and margin of victory
are not considered, for example. Performance ranges from +100 (for an undefeated
and untied team) to -100 (for a winless and untied team), with a .500 winning
percentage getting a zero performance.
SCHEDULE is the average rating of a team's opponents.
RATING is the sum of performance and schedule and represents an evaluation
of how each team has done so far with respect to the rest of the league.
The PTS column is the ranking of the teams based soley on points earned in
CCHA league games.