Kevin Cummings writes: ]Mike Manchik writes: ]}I write: ]}> Bowdoin's regular season record was 19-3-1 (17-2-1 ECAC III) while ]}> Merrimack was undefeated within the division. ]} ]} Merrimack wasn't undefeated; they were 15-2 in the ECAC East, having ]} lost at Union, 6-3, on 1/28/89 and at AIC, 5-2, on 2/13/89. ] ] Mike, if you read what Pete wrote, he said that Merrimack was undefeated ] "within the division". That means that Merrimack did not lose any games to ] any other ECAC East teams. ] Thanks for the defense, but unfortunately, AIC is in ECAC East so I can't even use that as an excuse. :-) I wrote the above mainly from memory (although I did have to look up Bowdoin's record :-)) I did mean their East/West record which is used to compute the standings. I must have mixed up my years -- was Merrimack undefeated the year before? Someone help save my sanity!! ] ... ] (ECAC North or South, but that would have been unlikely since ECAC East and ] West are/were ECAC Div 2, while North and South are/were ECAC Div. 3), ECAC East/West used to be ECAC div 2 until the NCAA eliminated div 2. Now ECAC div 3 consists of East/West/North/South, although North/South games do not count towards East/West teams standings and vice versa. ] ... I know that when the NCAA eliminated ] Div 2 Hockey (at the NCAA level) that things got a little (more) confusing ] here in the East (read: ECAC). How true! With the East/West and North/South separation, ECAC div 3 effectively has two conferences within the conference. Pete "looks like it's time for a vacation" Kester