Dean Barker writes:
>While stating his argument in the HE vs. ECAC battle Sid Whitaker writes:
>
>> To say that UMD in 84-85 was not a championship-calibre team is
>> simply untrue. UMD certainly deserved to win, and it was only by
>> chance that they lost to RPI.
>
>UMD had one player on that team that was real dominant. What was that
>players name? Hmmm, I can't remember.........was it, uh....Hull......
>Naw, it couldn't have been.
 
    Hull didn't have a bad season in 84-85 - 32-28--60 in 48 games, but
    Bill Watson was the nation's leading scorer and won the Hobey with
    49-60--109 in 46 games.  Duluth had three other players who
    actually scored more points than Hull.  But in 1985-86, The Golden
    Brett racked up 52-32--84 in 42 games, fifth in the nation.
 
 
    - mike (statistics, we deliver)