Dean Barker writes: >While stating his argument in the HE vs. ECAC battle Sid Whitaker writes: > >> To say that UMD in 84-85 was not a championship-calibre team is >> simply untrue. UMD certainly deserved to win, and it was only by >> chance that they lost to RPI. > >UMD had one player on that team that was real dominant. What was that >players name? Hmmm, I can't remember.........was it, uh....Hull...... >Naw, it couldn't have been. Hull didn't have a bad season in 84-85 - 32-28--60 in 48 games, but Bill Watson was the nation's leading scorer and won the Hobey with 49-60--109 in 46 games. Duluth had three other players who actually scored more points than Hull. But in 1985-86, The Golden Brett racked up 52-32--84 in 42 games, fifth in the nation. - mike (statistics, we deliver)