Doesn't it seem odd that Harvard, with the top three scorers in the ECAC, is
only in a tie for fifth, while Cornell only has two players in the leaders
list and is first?  Clarkson has only one player (Dave Trombley) on the list
and is tied for second.  So, does it really matter where players are in the
scoring leaders list?
 
Just trying to calm the debate that went on about points vs. points per game
to determine scoring leaders...
 
Jeremy Hall
Clarkson University
[log in to unmask]
"LET'S GO TECH!"