Doesn't it seem odd that Harvard, with the top three scorers in the ECAC, is only in a tie for fifth, while Cornell only has two players in the leaders list and is first? Clarkson has only one player (Dave Trombley) on the list and is tied for second. So, does it really matter where players are in the scoring leaders list? Just trying to calm the debate that went on about points vs. points per game to determine scoring leaders... Jeremy Hall Clarkson University [log in to unmask] "LET'S GO TECH!"