(d) A may be substituted for by another or (who shall not have privileges) during a stoppage provided the change occurs within the line change procedure outlined in Rule 205(a).
When the substitute enters the game he will take his position without delay and no warm-up shall be permitted, except when either team uses its under Rule 636[f]. The original may not return to play until the next stoppage of play. For a violation, the offending team shall be assessed a bench minor for illegal substitution.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Lewin <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Mar 28, 2021 4:05 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: UMD-ND
I didn’t think UMD switched goalies because he was tired; the announcers said that the goalie was cramping up and just couldn’t continue. How would you feel as a back up goalie coming in to a situation like that? Thrilled? Scared S$$less? I was wondering whether the rules in hockey are like those in soccer or baseball. If the goalie came out and was able to hydrate well, could they have put him back in? Or once he was out, he wasn’t allowed back in.Sent from my iPadOn Mar 28, 2021, at 15:05, David Parter <[log in to unmask]> wrote:<[log in to unmask]>That's what happens in long overtimes... if there isn't a goal early in the (first) overtime, the game winner is more likely to be a sloppy goal due to fatigue.
I think coaches in tournament overtimes have interesting strategic choices:
- put out your top line(s) to try and win it early?
- go with your regular lines, to keep everyone somewhat fresh?
- at some point, if you see an opportunity put out your 3rd or 4th line, because they are fresh and the other team's
1st or 2nd line isn't?
Do you switch from your top line to a more normal rotation before the other team does? Is your double-shifted 1st line better than their 3rd line?
Of course, it all depends on your team, and the situation in that game. How tired are they? How deep is your roster? What are the ice conditions? ...
I don't think i've heard of a team changing goalies for long overtimes, that would be a bold move.
--david
On 3/28/21 11:28 AM, Mark Lewin wrote:
[log in to unmask]"> I agree totally. There was nothing spectacular about the winning shot. It was a mental mistake on the part of the UND goalie. Not detracting from his performance. Although he doesn’t expend his physical energy as much as a forward or defenseman, he needs to keep mentally alert and doesn’t get a rest on the bench during line changes. After 3 periods plus 5 overtime periods, the ability to focus mentally is just as impaired as the ability to skate and shoot. I’m sure that last goal will haunt this poor kid for the rest of his life. But the team in front of him didn’t score the winning goal and the team in front of him didn’t defend against the UMD player who scored the winning goal. It’s really true what the coaches say: you win as a team and you lose as a team.
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 28, 2021, at 12:06, Tom Rowe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
As I sit and think about it more, I suspect goalie fatigue played a role. The shot was not fully screened, wasn't a screamer, and the goalie (name escapes me) just didn't get his 5-hole closed quick enough. I really think earlier in the game he would have stopped that shot. That brings to mind, did ND have a fresh second goalie they could have put in? Or do you folks see it differently.
Tom Rowe
=====================================================
The water never clears up until you get the hogs out of the creek.
Excelsior Ad Astra!
======================================================On 3/28/2021 10:31 AM, Robert Woodbury wrote:
[log in to unmask]"> At the 2nd OT intermission, I fell unknowingly asleep. When I woke up, I didn’t realize I had been asleep (the joys of old age), thinking the 3rd overtime was coming up. Then I saw the final score of the Minnesota game. That couldn’t be. The start of the 3rd OT and the Minnesota third period would both start at about the same time. There was a never-ending series of commercials, then back to the intermission hosts who said nothing about where we were in the game, more commercials, then the game. She almost I’m mediately said it was the start of the 5th OT. That got my attention. Had I really slept through the 3rd and 4th OTs? Yes. The Dogs scored quickly, I smiled, turned off the TV and lights and resumed resting until 9:30 this morning. The joys of a hockey fan.
On Mar 28, 2021, at 1:51 AM, Tom Rowe <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Wow. Just, Wow. Shattered the OT record (although not the longest game I ever witnessed). I sure thought ND was going to pull it out, but UMD got one screened shot home. Hope everyone had a chance to watch it live.
--
Tom Rowe
=====================================================
The water never clears up until you get the hogs out of the creek.
Excelsior Ad Astra!
======================================================