Thanks Bill for your efforts. I will take a top placing in the WCHA and a 3
point escape from last as a success.

On Sun, Mar 21, 2021, 2:59 PM Bill Fenwick <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> With the conference post-season tournaments over and the NCAA tournament
> (hopefully?) almost upon us, it's time to announce the winners of the Pick
> the Post-Season Tournament contests.  For Contest #1, in which the later
> rounds were weighted more than the earlier ones, the overall winner is...
>
>      Nathan Hampton
>
> who successfully defended his crown with a total of 140 points, four better
> than runners-up Tony Buffa and Scott Kaplan.  Congratulations again,
> Nathan!  Although it's a bit intriguing to note that, even with several
> tourney upsets, simply picking the higher seed in each game/series would
> have won this year's contest.
>
> As for the individual conference winners...
>
> The ECAC "race" ended in a five-way tie among Sean Keller, Nathan Hampton,
> John Edwards, Tony Buffa, and Richard Vehlow, with 8 points each.  Sean
> took the tiebreaker as his predicted score was only one point off the
> actual result.
>
> William Sangrey took the top spot in Hockey East with 36 points.
>
> The WCHA crown went to Jim Dixon with 18 points.
>
> Tony Buffa's 44 points topped the NCHC.
>
> Atlantic Hockey was won by Nathan Hampton with 41 points.
>
> The Big Ten came down to a three-way tie among Scott Kaplan, Nathan
> Hampton, and Tony Buffa, with 38 points each.  Scott took the crown on the
> first tie-breaker.
>
> Complete scoring results are below.  Congratulations to all the winners,
> and thanks again to all those who participated.
>
> Tiebreaker notes:  The first tiebreaker was the difference between your
> predicted championship-game score and the actual score.  Thus, if you
> picked the score of the ECAC championship game (actually 3-2) to be 5-2,
> you would get two points; if you picked 4-0, you would get three points;
> and if you picked 6-1, you would get four points.  Obviously, the lower the
> point score the better.
>
> The second tiebreaker was the difference between your predicted total of
> goals scored in the entire tournament and the actual number.  Again, the
> lower the point total the better.
>
> As far as tiebreakers that were actually needed:
>
> For the ECAC, the championship game score was 3-2.
>
> For the Big Ten, the championship game score was 6-4.
>
> The USCHO prognosticators' numbers are included below, as are the "Higher
> Seed" picks showing what would have happened if the higher seed for each
> game had been picked to win.  It should be noted that the USCHO staff did
> not pick the games all at once, the way the rest of us did, which in some
> cases was especially advantageous.
>
>
> OVERALL
> NAME                   TOTAL
> Nathan Hampton          140
> Tony Buffa              136
> Sean Keller             136
> Scott Kaplan            127
> William Sangrey         120
> Jim Dixon               103
> Bill Fenwick            100
> Mark Lewin              100
> * John Edwards           76
> * Richard Vehlow          8
>
> USCHO                   141
> Higher Seed             142
>
> * Did not submit picks for all conferences
>
> ECAC                         Tiebreaker 1    Hockey East
> NAME                   TOTAL  Score Pts      NAME                   TOTAL
> Sean Keller              8     4-2   1       William Sangrey         36
> Nathan Hampton           8     4-3   2       John Edwards            33
> John Edwards             8     3-0   2       Sean Keller             33
> Tony Buffa               8     5-3   3       Scott Kaplan            23
> Richard Vehlow           8           5       Tony Buffa              20
> Scott Kaplan             0                   Bill Fenwick            12
> Jim Dixon                0                   Jim Dixon               12
> William Sangrey          0                   Mark Lewin              12
> Bill Fenwick             0                   Nathan Hampton           9
> Mark Lewin               0
>                                              USCHO                   17
> USCHO                    8                   Higher Seed              9
> Higher Seed              8
>
> WCHA                            NCHC
> NAME                   TOTAL    NAME                   TOTAL
> Jim Dixon               18      Tony Buffa              44
> Bill Fenwick            12      William Sangrey         36
> Mark Lewin              12      Sean Keller             36
> Nathan Hampton          11      Nathan Hampton          33
> Scott Kaplan            11      Scott Kaplan            33
> William Sangrey         10      Mark Lewin              33
> Sean Keller              8      Jim Dixon               30
> Tony Buffa               8      Bill Fenwick            30
>
> USCHO                   20      USCHO                   36
> Higher Seed             20      Higher Seed             41
>
> Atlantic Hockey                 Big Ten                      Tiebreaker 1
> NAME                   TOTAL    NAME                   TOTAL  Score Pts
> Nathan Hampton          41      Scott Kaplan            38     4-2   4
> John Edwards            35      Nathan Hampton          38     3-2   5
> Mark Lewin              34      Tony Buffa              38     2-1   7
> Sean Keller             34      Bill Fenwick            22
> Bill Fenwick            24      Jim Dixon               22
> Scott Kaplan            22      William Sangrey         17
> William Sangrey         21      Sean Keller             17
> Jim Dixon               21      Mark Lewin               9
> Tony Buffa               8
>                                 USCHO                   38
> USCHO                   22      Higher Seed             22
> Higher Seed             42
>
> --
> Bill Fenwick                                                 DJF   5/27/94
> Cornell '86 and '95                                          JCF   12/2/97
> LET'S GO RED!!
>