I didn't see it live, and did not see
where the officials were (or what they might have seen).
According to College Hockey News:
"I asked them to take a look at it," Carle
said. "I was asked if I wanted to use my challenge and I chose
not to."
I want that call made at the time, and the NCAA wants that call
made. But if it wasn't made during play, and the officials did not
see enough to call for video review on their own, and the coach
chooses not to use his challenge.. then that's the way it is.
Why didn't he use his challenge? saving the challenge/timeout?
---david
On 4/12/19 12:31 AM, Tom wrote:
I have never been a fan of the ref swallowing the whistle so they
don't influence the outcome of a game. If its a penalty in period
one, its a penalty with 2 min to go in period 3! If you swallow
the whistle you ARE influencing the outcome of the game just as
much as if you call the penalty. Clearly that 3rd major should
have been called. I question the first major or UMass where it
looked to me like the chest glanced off the shoulder then hit the
head, but it was called. why, then, not the last one which was
more egregious?
Tom Rowe
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sometimes I use big words I don't full understand
in order to make me seem more prosopagnosic.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On 4/11/2019 10:37 PM, Mark Lewin
wrote:
Of all the stupid hits, the one that probably
qualified as a game
DQ was the one they didn't call. Refs don't
like to make a call that will affect the outcome of the game,
especially a championship game, but that was just negligent on
the part of the referees. Of all penalties to call
consistently, no matter when in the game or whether it affects
the outcome of a game, you would expect that contact to the
head to be the one they always call.
I'm thinking this might not be the last we hear about
this.
Unless the NCAA, after reviewing the
call(s), imposes supplemental discipline and says he
(they) sit out the next game.
Trivigno got away with one.
Joe LaCour
Sent from my Mobile phone
No. They were game
misconduct penalties. Suspensions are issued for game
disqualifications
Sent from my iPad
> On Apr 11, 2019, at 23:14, Carol White <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>
> There were three 5-min major penalties called in
the game. Each had a 10 min game Misconduct with it.
Are the players suspended for the next game?
>
> Carol, QoGH
>
> Sent from my iPod
