Carol, yes I will be in Chicago.

John, yes that's the goal I'm still confused about. If there were too many men on the ice why was no Lowell player sent to the bench. I was sitting at the opposite end of the play and couldn't make heads or tails of what was happening. The score board at Manchester was terrible. The video section was a low-def square screen that was totally useless. You were lucky if you could read the the score let alone a video replay. 

Regards
Bongi

Go Hawks!!
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: UMass goal
From: John T Whelan <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Sun, March 26, 2017 7:52 pm
To: [log in to unmask]

You mean the goal that was scored as a result of a player jumping off
the bench when all four penalty killers were still on the other side
of the red line? The only problem with that replay was that the
officals couldn't assess a minor for too many men on the ice (and that
they didn't call it in real time).

John Whelan
Cornell '91

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017, Sebastian Bongiorno wrote:

> Still lurking around.
> I missed the beginning of the thread and don't know what goal you guys are
> talking about. I'm still trying to figure out the goal the called back
> yesterday against Cornell.
> Still a little in shock from today's game. Was really thinking we would make
> it to Chicago. Oh well can't complain about the rest of the year it was a
> pleasant surprise.
>
> Regards
> Bongi
> Go Hawks!!
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: UMass goal
> From: Carol White <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Sun, March 26, 2017 1:54 pm
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Missed that.  BONJI!  Are you still on here?
>
> Carol
>
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Tom <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Why wasn't the goal disallowed for a man in the crease?  I
> obviously don't understand the rule correctly.
>
> Tom Rowe
> --
> ------------------------------
> I hate it when people use big words just to make
> themselves sound perspicacious.
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>